Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To win the wc of computerchess means nothing.

Author: Thomas Lagershausen

Date: 09:38:04 03/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On March 21, 2002 at 22:30:48, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On March 21, 2002 at 19:21:22, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On March 21, 2002 at 17:52:36, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>
>>>DJ7 is worldchampion of computerchess.Todays game  against Gulko shows that this
>>>means nothing. When the program had to play against a human player completly
>>>other things are important to play a highrated game.Junior is the weakest
>>>program in the competion against Gulko.Gulko had played real antichess today but
>>>DeepJunior7 canĀ“t improve the own position.The opposite was the case.It weakens
>>>the own kingside with pawn h4? and h5? and makes senseless moves with the rooks
>>>and the knights.So we have another example that ratinglists of computerchess are
>>>far away from the reality.
>>>
>>>TL
>>
>>I believe the h4, h5 manoeuvre is a good one.
>>
>>Amir
>
>Thomas posting shows how important for sales games versus
>humans are. Even if kasparov would play 1.g4 2.f4 against your program,
>the winning program would still be called "world champion" level,
>whatever the name of the program...
>
>Thomas obviously knows very little about computerchess.
>
>Best regards,
>Vincent

Hi Vincent,

can you please explain the community what you mean.Which secrets i have to know?

Regards
Thomas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.