Author: Danniel Corbit
Date: 15:19:02 07/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
Factual errors are likely a matter of definition. If I call something "pruning" and yet it does not go along with mainstream thought, it may just be a matter of terms. I think factual errors are not a reason to censor a post -- but you might do something like this: [The term "pruning" is used in an unusual way in this post -- Moderator] Censoring should be used in cases like these: 1. Personal attacks 2. Bad language 3. Completely off-topic 4. Idiotic posts such as quoting a 400 line message and adding "me too" at the bottom as your only remark. Surely, moderation is a judgement call. But it is also possible that the moderators are the ones with the wrong "correct" definition at times. So for factual errors, I would simply make a note like the one above.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.