Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:57:14 07/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 1998 at 18:03:50, SEAN EVANS wrote: >The Asshole writes: > >This is one of the emails in the thread you are referring to, what happened is >Moritz Berger felt that Vincent Diepeveen was attacking his "Best Buddy" >Schroeder in another thread about Rebel's Killer Books and he did not like that! > >No I do not think Mr. Diepeveen's post should have been destroyed by the >Censors! > >In fact several Club Members and I concurred with the above statement and stated >this in the Thread. > >Your friend in Computer Chess, > >The Apostle Sean I would like to ask the moderators to take two actions: 1. remove this post. We do not need "the asshole writes" here... 2. remove Sean's user ID. He has repeatedly shown that he has no regard for the truth, and only wants to enflame. Let him do it elsewhere. My vote, from *one* member's point of view, is *enough*. > > > > >Subject: Re: MODERATION, please >From: Bruce Moreland >E-mail: brucemo@seanet.com >Message Number: 20763 >Date: June 17, 1998 at 02:21:01 > In Reply to: Re: MODERATION, please > Message ID: 20742 > Posted by: Vincent Diepeveen > At: diep@xs4all.nl > On: June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19 > > >On June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>I'm not attacking Rebel for making the killerbook, i'm not even attacking >>rebel. It's clear that it won from Diep this match. I just want YOU the audience >>to know that book cooking is happening, and that the rebel book was again >>a reaction on the killing cg5 book (cg5 book kills especially rebel8 book). > >I think I would like to understand where you are going with all of this, >Vincent. I'm confused because whenever I see threads like this my brain swells >up and I can't understand or remember anything. > >You think Rebel is tuned against various things? > >You think Fritz is tuned against various things? > >It seems obvious that some programs are tuned against some other programs, for >instance MChess has had a special book for a really long time, so it's not >unprecedented for things to be tuned against other things. > >Do you think someone has acted improperly here, and if so, how can we discuss it >in such a way that it doesn't degrade into a huge shrieking match? > >Is this just a new round of the old killer book discussion or is there more to >this? > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.