Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: When not to delete a post

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 19:39:03 07/08/98

Go up one level in this thread


On July 08, 1998 at 20:57:14, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On July 08, 1998 at 18:03:50, SEAN EVANS wrote:
>
>>The Asshole writes:
>>
>>This is one of the emails in the thread you are referring to, what happened is
>>Moritz Berger felt that Vincent Diepeveen was attacking his "Best Buddy"
>>Schroeder in another thread about Rebel's Killer Books and he did not like that!
>>
>>No I do not think Mr. Diepeveen's post should have been destroyed by the
>>Censors!
>>
>>In fact several Club Members and I concurred with the above statement and stated
>>this in the Thread.
>>
>>Your friend in Computer Chess,
>>
>>The Apostle Sean
>
>
>I would like to ask the moderators to take two actions:
>
>1.  remove this post.  We do not need "the asshole writes" here...
>
>2.  remove Sean's user ID.  He has repeatedly shown that he has no regard
>for the truth, and only wants to enflame.  Let him do it elsewhere.  My vote,
>from *one* member's point of view, is *enough*.
>
>


I appear to have misinterpreted the above.  Apparently Sean was calling
himself an "asshole".  Since I happen to agree with him, I hereby want to
correct my above post.  However, Sean continually accuses CCC moderators
of deeds that they did not do...  so I would still personally like to see
him become a part of history, not the future, in CCC.


>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Subject: Re: MODERATION, please
>>From: Bruce Moreland
>>E-mail: brucemo@seanet.com
>>Message Number: 20763
>>Date: June 17, 1998 at 02:21:01
>>  In Reply to: Re: MODERATION, please
>>  Message ID: 20742
>>  Posted by: Vincent Diepeveen
>>  At: diep@xs4all.nl
>>  On: June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19
>>
>>
>>On June 16, 1998 at 16:57:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not attacking Rebel for making the killerbook, i'm not even attacking
>>>rebel. It's clear that it won from Diep this match. I just want YOU the audience
>>>to know that book cooking is happening, and that the rebel book was again
>>>a reaction on the killing cg5 book (cg5 book kills especially rebel8 book).
>>
>>I think I would like to understand where you are going with all of this,
>>Vincent.  I'm confused because whenever I see threads like this my brain swells
>>up and I can't understand or remember anything.
>>
>>You think Rebel is tuned against various things?
>>
>>You think Fritz is tuned against various things?
>>
>>It seems obvious that some programs are tuned against some other programs, for
>>instance MChess has had a special book for a really long time, so it's not
>>unprecedented for things to be tuned against other things.
>>
>>Do you think someone has acted improperly here, and if so, how can we discuss it
>>in such a way that it doesn't degrade into a huge shrieking match?
>>
>>Is this just a new round of the old killer book discussion or is there more to
>>this?
>>
>>bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.