Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 17:41:21 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 17:50:34, Bertil Eklund wrote: >Can you explain your points in a better way so we can understand why it is >better to take advice from the "T" siblings!? Who are the "T" siblings? There can be only one Czub. I really don't understand his points any better than you do. It was just a guess based on previous discussions. Replacing "I think" with "I suspect" might have made that more obvious. The actual value and purpose of the SSDF list is worth a discussion without the people involved getting overly defensive. Personally, I have very little use for the list in it's present form. But that is really beside the point. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.