Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 14:50:34 03/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2002 at 11:15:52, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On March 28, 2002 at 08:34:44, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>In my opinion, the SSDF people are doing a great job. And be honest: have you >>ever seen any programs placed at the top of the SSDF-list that did not belong >>the the best ones of the world? > >That's hardly surprising given the composition of the list. The majority of the >best chess programs are, or becomes, commercial and are then tested by the SSDF. >I think Thorsten is hinting at the "How?" and "Why?" of the individual engine >results instead of the ability to produce a convincing winning percentage. >Somewhat difficult to measure, however. You can analyse the games of each engine >yourself of course, but that is hardly appealling. > >So I would like to add my name to Daniel's (Sargon's) question. What is the >point of the SSDF rating list? In my opinion it is suffering from inbreeding. >Fritz is in the lead again. Oh well. > Can you explain your points in a better way so we can understand why it is better to take advice from the "T" siblings!? Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.