Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 11:16:41 04/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2002 at 12:14:47, Sune Fischer wrote: >IMHO the rating of programs would drop 100-200 elo if the programs could enter >regular tournaments. The GMs would quickly discover some of their weaknesses, >they would learn good anti-comp strategies and would always be able to at least >draw the things. it's an endless struggle since also comps improves vs. humans... >The fact is, that humans still have a far better positional eval than programs. >I think even low-rated (>1600) playes has a better positional understanding, but >they just get killed in tactics (probably why they can win with the fischer-move >rule:). >At some point the brute force will of cause prevail, since even a GM has a >*tactical limit*. > >I was surprised that Gulko prased Hiarcs on the positional play, I wonder if >Hiarcs is that good in all types of positions ;) > >-S. Unfortunately for humans tactics has got an heaviest weight in this wonderful game IMHO...and if we approximate (tactics) it very much , at the end we can find an amazing positional play, probably is what happened for Hiarcs ? Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.