Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 01:47:03 07/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 1998 at 19:55:17, Shaun Graham wrote: >First of all there is a trickle down period before the games are incorporated >into databases that they might be examined. Further no one said that you would >use the same person to play for fritz in the tourneys(remember again this is >swiss system), Indeed to make the experiment as absolutly valid as possible you >would use different people for the tournaments so no one would ever know it's >john and he plays X. The 'trickle-down' period for a GM at the same tournament is 1 round. The 'trickle-down' period for a GM not attending the tournament is about a week. >This isn't an insult but you apparently have no knowledge >of correct scientific investigative technique either. Interesting observation. I have a B.Sc. though, I must have done something right. >>It doesn't matter that opponents of Jeff wouldn't try for a Scholar's mate >>against any grandmaster, it becomes 'standard play' against Jeff because it is >>successful. >> > >Not even applicable The analogy is valid, you'll just have to think about it some more. Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.