Author: Shaun Graham
Date: 04:27:41 07/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 1998 at 04:47:03, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On July 14, 1998 at 19:55:17, Shaun Graham wrote: > >>First of all there is a trickle down period before the games are incorporated >>into databases that they might be examined. Further no one said that you would >>use the same person to play for fritz in the tourneys(remember again this is >>swiss system), Indeed to make the experiment as absolutly valid as possible you >>would use different people for the tournaments so no one would ever know it's >>john and he plays X. > >The 'trickle-down' period for a GM at the same tournament is 1 round. The >'trickle-down' period for a GM not attending the tournament is about a week. > >>This isn't an insult but you apparently have no knowledge >>of correct scientific investigative technique either. > >Interesting observation. I have a B.Sc. though, I must have done something >right. > >>>It doesn't matter that opponents of Jeff wouldn't try for a Scholar's mate >>>against any grandmaster, it becomes 'standard play' against Jeff because it is >>>successful. >>> >> >>Not even applicable > >The analogy is valid, you'll just have to think about it some more. > Not valid because the fritz player is always new and unknown entity entering the tournament, the possibility of learning he plays x and is susceptible to 1 is inapplicable
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.