Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:52:33 04/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2002 at 12:49:59, Chris Carson wrote: >On April 15, 2002 at 11:52:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 15, 2002 at 08:56:27, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2002 at 08:17:04, Claudio A. Amorim wrote: >>> >>>>So, are these the programs supposed to play at a 2700 level? Sure, they win many >>>>games against strong humans, but... Where is their chess competency? Shredder´s >>>>errors against Smirin were so elementary that they would not fit well in a >>>>strong club player´s blitz game. >>> >>>Let's not go crazy over ONE game! we need to ask these questions after the >>>match, also you can not say "So, are these the programs supposed to play at a >>>2700 level?" when this is a games based on one programs performance! >>>Other than that i agree, it was not pretty... >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >> >>I think the thing that troubles _some_ of us greatly is this question: >> >>"Can you name any GM that would play a single game that looks as bad as >> that one?" > >Kasparov (2800+) vs DBII the final game. Yes, that one must be the best of all. Really a awful game by the best GM of our age. > >> >>Of course, questions like "OK, how can a program play like a 2600+ in one game >> then play like a 1900- in another game?" and that _is_ a good question. But >>as the old proverb goes, "the chain is only as strong as its weakest link." IE >>Smirin could lose the remainder of the games (not likely of course) and it would >>_still_ be difficult to call this a "GM performance" after a game like that... >> >>GMs do have bad days. But not _that_ bad. It perfectly highlighted just how >>weakly programs evaluate king-safety. _all_ programs...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.