Author: blass uri
Date: 04:12:15 07/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 1998 at 04:31:54, Howard Exner wrote: >On July 20, 1998 at 00:55:18, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On July 18, 1998 at 20:28:44, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On July 18, 1998 at 03:52:14, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 17, 1998 at 14:02:14, Howard Exner wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Here's what I'm getting in this position: >>>>>1. Rxe6 fxe6 2. Bh6 a6 3. Bxa6 Qc7 4. Nxe6 Qc6 5. Bxb7 Qxb7 6. Re1 Qc6 >>>>>7. Qf3 Ne5 8. Ng7+ Kd8 9. Qe4 Bf6 10. Nc5 >>>> >>>>after 7.Qf3 my programs play N7f6 >>> >>>This move, N7f6 is better than what I proposed. I realize that most the >>>computer programs will consider this quite hopeless for white now. But >>>just to satisfy my curiousity do you mind if we continue on a bit. >>>Does the next set of moves look reasonable to you. >>> >>>7 ...N7f6 8.Nac5 Rg8 9. Nd3 >>my move is 9...Qb7 and if 10.Ng7+ Kd7 > >In this line 11. Nf4. after 11.Nf4 I play kc6 > >Another line of interest instead of 10. Ng7+ is 10. g4 >What then? I am going to check it when I have time for this position. Uri > >>I am optimistic about black's chances(my programs evaluate the position after >>Nd3 as advantage for black but only an advantage of near 1 pawn
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.