Author: blass uri
Date: 04:53:58 07/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 1998 at 07:12:15, blass uri wrote: > >On July 20, 1998 at 04:31:54, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On July 20, 1998 at 00:55:18, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On July 18, 1998 at 20:28:44, Howard Exner wrote: >>> >>>>On July 18, 1998 at 03:52:14, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On July 17, 1998 at 14:02:14, Howard Exner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Here's what I'm getting in this position: >>>>>>1. Rxe6 fxe6 2. Bh6 a6 3. Bxa6 Qc7 4. Nxe6 Qc6 5. Bxb7 Qxb7 6. Re1 Qc6 >>>>>>7. Qf3 Ne5 8. Ng7+ Kd8 9. Qe4 Bf6 10. Nc5 >>>>> >>>>>after 7.Qf3 my programs play N7f6 >>>> >>>>This move, N7f6 is better than what I proposed. I realize that most the >>>>computer programs will consider this quite hopeless for white now. But >>>>just to satisfy my curiousity do you mind if we continue on a bit. >>>>Does the next set of moves look reasonable to you. >>>> >>>>7 ...N7f6 8.Nac5 Rg8 9. Nd3 >>>my move is 9...Qb7 and if 10.Ng7+ Kd7 >> >>In this line 11. Nf4. > >after 11.Nf4 I play kc6 I think kc7 is better than Kc6 because after Kc6 I do not like Re6+ Uri >> >>Another line of interest instead of 10. Ng7+ is 10. g4 >>What then? >I am going to check it when I have time for this position. > >Uri >> >>>I am optimistic about black's chances(my programs evaluate the position after >>>Nd3 as advantage for black but only an advantage of near 1 pawn
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.