Author: blass uri
Date: 07:45:39 07/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 1998 at 04:31:54, Howard Exner wrote: >On July 20, 1998 at 00:55:18, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On July 18, 1998 at 20:28:44, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On July 18, 1998 at 03:52:14, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 17, 1998 at 14:02:14, Howard Exner wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Here's what I'm getting in this position: >>>>>1. Rxe6 fxe6 2. Bh6 a6 3. Bxa6 Qc7 4. Nxe6 Qc6 5. Bxb7 Qxb7 6. Re1 Qc6 >>>>>7. Qf3 Ne5 8. Ng7+ Kd8 9. Qe4 Bf6 10. Nc5 >>>> >>>>after 7.Qf3 my programs play N7f6 >>> >>>This move, N7f6 is better than what I proposed. I realize that most the >>>computer programs will consider this quite hopeless for white now. But >>>just to satisfy my curiousity do you mind if we continue on a bit. >>>Does the next set of moves look reasonable to you. >>> >>>7 ...N7f6 8.Nac5 Rg8 9. Nd3 >>my move is 9...Qb7 and if 10.Ng7+ Kd7 > >In this line 11. Nf4. the new version of Junior Amir Ban sent me after more than 2 hours at depth 16 plays Kc6 expecting Re6+ Kb5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Rxe7 Rc2... with evaluation of 0.27 pawns advantage for black. I think white can play after Re6+ Kb5 Ne2 and I do not like black position maybe Qb7 was a mistake and maybe black should sacrifice the rook by 10...Rxg7. the new version of Junior played 9...Qb7 at depth 17 when I stopped Junior from calculating the position before Qb7 after 10 hours it was considering Qa4 for a long time expecting 10.Ng7+ Kd7 11.Nf4 I thought it is a good idea to move the king to one side of the board if white play with the knights to the other side of the board but I see that it is not so simple. Uri > >Another line of interest instead of 10. Ng7+ is 10. g4 >What then? > >>I am optimistic about black's chances(my programs evaluate the position after >>Nd3 as advantage for black but only an advantage of near 1 pawn
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.