Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 17:51:49 04/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2002 at 19:05:11, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On April 20, 2002 at 17:50:36, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>Of course you and I are far more advanced then anything we have yet created. >>Also it is demeaning to be lowered by machines through other people's eyes. > >Have you never thought that chess doesn't require a very high level of human >intelligence ? Yes and for humans it requires intelligence, period. That is a mistake to think otherwise. Known this for years and years and years. For machines, it's different and we are different than machines, IE Computers. Does a Mathamatician need intelligence? Of course! Does the computer? No! We give it other ways and means to solve. We _invent_ the process for them! > You got to know simple rules and have very good visual memory to excel... ok the >training is important but you haven't got to be an universal genius. >Think about it ... I have and know you don't need a 180 IQ but it does help, like memory practise etc. > >>We are higher than the best machine yet by miles, except for speed and maybe >>memory on the greatest of supercomputers. >>But they are as crude as and dumb as a "hammer" compared to us. >> >>In a thousand years, it may be the other way round. >> > >Neither in a million years.... > >w.b.r. >Otello How do you know? I think you are too caught up by your perceptions mixed with belief to accept you may be in error. We all including mysef fall into this trap. This time I feel you have. Terry
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.