Author: fca
Date: 20:46:39 07/21/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 20, 1998 at 02:43:58, Howard Exner wrote: >On July 19, 1998 at 22:21:44, fca wrote: > >>On July 19, 1998 at 19:19:55, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On July 19, 1998 at 15:41:03, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On July 18, 1998 at 20:28:44, Howard Exner wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 18, 1998 at 03:52:14, blass uri wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On July 17, 1998 at 14:02:14, Howard Exner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Here's what I'm getting in this position: >>>>>>>1. Rxe6 fxe6 2. Bh6 a6 3. Bxa6 Qc7 4. Nxe6 Qc6 5. Bxb7 Qxb7 6. Re1 Qc6 >>>>>>>7. Qf3 Ne5 8. Ng7+ Kd8 9. Qe4 Bf6 10. Nc5 >>>>>> >>>>>>after 7.Qf3 my programs play N7f6 >> >>Dear Howard >> >>White has a couple of resources apparently not mentioned in the threads... >>perhaps because (correctly) their refutations had been found. But it all gets >>very long... So.... >> >>If it is still your opinion that 1 Rxe6 does not lose... :-) >> >>Either: >> >>1. Let us play it here by pseudo-email. No take-backs, No "if"s :-) >>2. Or by real email, but that leaves others out >>3. On ICC - I will give most replies instantly, as I have now concluded my >>studies of the position. ( Summary 1. Rxe6?? -+ ). > >or 4. You join Uri and I in the thread here. Will do, as time permits :-) A question: since no comp (R10?) will AFAIK play 2 Bh6, should it be used in the example to try to justify 1. Rxe6? This is no different than >what my friends and I do at the local chess club. We discuss a position, >have differing opinions, analyse. Anyone can jump in at any time to >express there ideas on the position. Likewise here of course in this >public forum. Actually, if you've followed this thread you would have >read a few days ago that I wrote, "fca, what are you finding here?" I read it, but did not have my cc with me then (only a laptop). > >I don't really know if white will lose this position yet or not. If >you know for sure just show Uri and me what we are missing >and post what you've discovered here. > >If you've missed the recent threads here a quick summary is that I don't really >trust how computers evaluate positions that invole the king stranded in the >middle. Check the recently posted Valvo-Deep Thought game and see how "happy" >your programs are when Black (Valvo) plays Ba6. Will do. Kind regards fca
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.