Author: blass uri
Date: 07:00:44 07/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 1998 at 09:25:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On July 22, 1998 at 03:58:48, Mark Young wrote: >>Thorsten's logic about Fritz 5 has never made much sense. He has some kind of >>bias against Fritz 5, So when he talks about it he does not remember all the >>results the prove his point moot. Now how he can take Rebel's results and turn >>it around to show how bad and stupid Fritz 5 is at playing chess escapes me. >Nonsense.When I say something i do have prove ! >I telephoned with Moritz, and he told me that Rebel10 kills fritz5 in blitz ! >This was original coming from MORITZ himself. >Of course Moritz will never openly say something like this in public, guess why >? > > >So - he told me that rebel10 kills fritz in blitz. >That fits to the results. doesn't it. >Concentrate on facts uri ! I did not say fritz5 is better than rebel10 The truth is that I do not know and the match with anand is not convincing evidence. Uri >Don't repeat your prejudices. They get boring with the time. >Ask somebody who has rebel10, and you will be informed ! >If data is something that convinces you... > >>But >>the fact that he tries proves his bias. > >Pah ! >Rebel plays better chess. This has nothing to do with BIAS or whatever you want >to construct. > > >>Now if he want to try and argue that >>Rebel 10 may be better, then that's a point he could try to argue. > >Rebel10 is better. And i only hope that the ssdf-guys will never be allowed to >publish this. As far as I know they get the request to delete all rebel versions >from their list.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.