Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 06:25:29 07/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 1998 at 03:58:48, Mark Young wrote: >Thorsten's logic about Fritz 5 has never made much sense. He has some kind of >bias against Fritz 5, So when he talks about it he does not remember all the >results the prove his point moot. Now how he can take Rebel's results and turn >it around to show how bad and stupid Fritz 5 is at playing chess escapes me. Nonsense.When I say something i do have prove ! I telephoned with Moritz, and he told me that Rebel10 kills fritz5 in blitz ! This was original coming from MORITZ himself. Of course Moritz will never openly say something like this in public, guess why ? So - he told me that rebel10 kills fritz in blitz. That fits to the results. doesn't it. Concentrate on facts uri ! Don't repeat your prejudices. They get boring with the time. Ask somebody who has rebel10, and you will be informed ! If data is something that convinces you... >But >the fact that he tries proves his bias. Pah ! Rebel plays better chess. This has nothing to do with BIAS or whatever you want to construct. >Now if he want to try and argue that >Rebel 10 may be better, then that's a point he could try to argue. Rebel10 is better. And i only hope that the ssdf-guys will never be allowed to publish this. As far as I know they get the request to delete all rebel versions from their list.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.