Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:19:08 07/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 22, 1998 at 09:25:29, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On July 22, 1998 at 03:58:48, Mark Young wrote: >>Thorsten's logic about Fritz 5 has never made much sense. He has some kind of >>bias against Fritz 5, So when he talks about it he does not remember all the >>results the prove his point moot. Now how he can take Rebel's results and turn >>it around to show how bad and stupid Fritz 5 is at playing chess escapes me. >Nonsense.When I say something i do have prove ! >I telephoned with Moritz, and he told me that Rebel10 kills fritz5 in blitz ! >This was original coming from MORITZ himself. >Of course Moritz will never openly say something like this in public, guess why >? > > >So - he told me that rebel10 kills fritz in blitz. >That fits to the results. doesn't it. >Concentrate on facts uri ! >Don't repeat your prejudices. They get boring with the time. >Ask somebody who has rebel10, and you will be informed ! >If data is something that convinces you... > >>But >>the fact that he tries proves his bias. > >Pah ! >Rebel plays better chess. This has nothing to do with BIAS or whatever you want >to construct. > > >>Now if he want to try and argue that >>Rebel 10 may be better, then that's a point he could try to argue. > >Rebel10 is better. And i only hope that the ssdf-guys will never be allowed to >publish this. As far as I know they get the request to delete all rebel versions >from their list. Ok, now I have read what MORITZ himself has to say. And he says you are a LIAR. My word not his. Does the word BIAS still bore you!! I don't mind someone looking at a game and say Hey even though Frtiz 5 has better results I think the other program is better. But when you out right lie to try and make your point you are the lowest of the low. The word bias is far to kind for your type of ilk.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.