Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 10:42:54 04/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2002 at 13:29:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On April 29, 2002 at 13:10:06, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>I agree. >> >>Two things that favours comps at 40/2h : >> >>1) Computer can deepen very much the analysis at 40/2 and reach elo level far >>better than shorter reflection time. >> >>2) Humans tends to fatigue mentally in the long run. >> >> >>Any objections ? > >Yes. I find both statements dubious at best, ie. exaggerated beyond the truth. > >Regards, >Mogens About the first statement could you explain why SSDF based their ELO estimates in 40/2h and not in blitz ? And about the second it's part of human physiology and doesn't need any further explanation, I hope. w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.