Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 01:35:38 07/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 1998 at 00:09:05, Moritz Berger wrote: >On July 28, 1998 at 16:28:39, Tina Long wrote: > >>Hi guys, >>I was examining a position in Fritz and decided to also open Hiarcs6 to check on >>the analysis the Hiarcs Engine in Fritz had given. I discovered something I then >>checked in much more detail. >> >>Hiarcs6, at the same ply level (11), on analysis 3 lines, had a different next >>best move, and the 2nd choiice in FritzHiarcs was 3rd best in Hiarcs6. > >maybe the multiple-variant mode is implemented differently. In normal play I >didn't notice any difference. > >>My main surprise was that Hiarcs 6 values were around 20 to 40 % higher than >>FritzHiarcs. Now I know Hiarcs6 gives a pawn a value of 125. >> >>Does FritzHiarcs give a pawn 100 value? > >That's correct. Pawn in Hiarcs 6/DOS=128, pawn in Hiarcs 6/Fritz=1.00 > >>Why would FritzHiarcs give different analysis to Hiarcs6? > >in non-multiple-variant mode, analysis should be exactly the same You have some extra settings in Hiarcs 6 for DOS, among them selectivity etc. That could give some differense in results. Torstein >>Could it be related to hash sizes? > >different hash table sizes usually lead to slightly different results > >>Which should I trust? > >both ;-) > >> >>Thanks guys, >>Tina Long >> >>(I also posted this message to RGCC)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.