Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 21:09:05 07/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 1998 at 16:28:39, Tina Long wrote: >Hi guys, >I was examining a position in Fritz and decided to also open Hiarcs6 to check on >the analysis the Hiarcs Engine in Fritz had given. I discovered something I then >checked in much more detail. > >Hiarcs6, at the same ply level (11), on analysis 3 lines, had a different next >best move, and the 2nd choiice in FritzHiarcs was 3rd best in Hiarcs6. maybe the multiple-variant mode is implemented differently. In normal play I didn't notice any difference. >My main surprise was that Hiarcs 6 values were around 20 to 40 % higher than >FritzHiarcs. Now I know Hiarcs6 gives a pawn a value of 125. > >Does FritzHiarcs give a pawn 100 value? That's correct. Pawn in Hiarcs 6/DOS=128, pawn in Hiarcs 6/Fritz=1.00 >Why would FritzHiarcs give different analysis to Hiarcs6? in non-multiple-variant mode, analysis should be exactly the same >Could it be related to hash sizes? different hash table sizes usually lead to slightly different results >Which should I trust? both ;-) > >Thanks guys, >Tina Long > >(I also posted this message to RGCC)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.