Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: when tablebases cause blunders

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 06:51:12 05/29/02

Go up one level in this thread

On May 29, 2002 at 03:01:53, Helmut Conrady wrote:

>On May 29, 2002 at 02:34:34, Robin Smith wrote:
>
>>The position is easily winning for white.  But tablebases cause programs to want
>>to play 1.Rxf5?? after which there is a tablebase mate in 65 .... except the 50
>>move rule kicks in first and the game ends up a draw.  Are there any programs
>>that avoid this type of blunder?  [D] 5k2/3K4/8/R4b2/1R6/8/3B4/5r2 w - - 0 1
>
>No. It isn t possible for a distance to mate-database to avoid draws under the
>50-move-rule. If you use a distance to conversion-database (like Thompson´s)
>this problem wouldn t arise.
>
>helmut

There are programs without tablebases but can any of them win this position vs a
program with tablebases?
Jim

• Re: when tablebases cause blunders Jeroen van Dorp 07:20:32 05/29/02
  • Re: when tablebases cause blunders Jeroen van Dorp 07:22:42 05/29/02
    • Re: when tablebases cause blunders James T. Walker 13:07:29 05/29/02
      • Re: when tablebases cause blunders James T. Walker 14:28:18 05/29/02
        • Re: when tablebases cause blunders Jeroen van Dorp 17:49:13 05/29/02
          • Re: when tablebases cause blunders Mogens Larsen 07:31:40 05/30/02
    • Re: when tablebases cause blunders Joshua Lee 09:45:49 05/29/02
      • Re: when tablebases cause blunders Jeroen van Dorp 17:50:19 05/29/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.