Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Brutus -

Author: Richard Bean

Date: 08:16:02 07/30/02

Go up one level in this thread

On July 30, 2002 at 05:36:55, Peter McKenzie wrote:

>>>2. Was Junior's -Rxc4 sac against Brutus really correct? I doubt a lot
>>>personally.
>>
>>to me as a 2200 player this sac looks terrific. i don't doubt it is correct.
>>unfortunately, there was no discussion here. if you post any stupid "mate in X"
>
>Would you mind posting it again, I haven't seen the position yet.

r1r5/3nbpk1/4qnp1/4p1Bp/1pN1P3/1PP2Q2/4N1PP/3R1R1K b - - 0 26

[D]r1r5/3nbpk1/4qnp1/4p1Bp/1pN1P3/1PP2Q2/4N1PP/3R1R1K b - - 0 26

• Re: Brutus - Joachim Rang 02:56:16 07/31/02
  • Re: Brutus - Joachim Rang 02:58:09 07/31/02
• Re: Brutus - Peter McKenzie 13:14:59 07/30/02
  • Re: Brutus - Uri Blass 16:28:01 07/30/02
• Re: Brutus - Eelco de Groot 13:12:12 07/30/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.