Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 13:14:59 07/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2002 at 11:16:02, Richard Bean wrote: >On July 30, 2002 at 05:36:55, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>>>2. Was Junior's -Rxc4 sac against Brutus really correct? I doubt a lot >>>>personally. >>> >>>to me as a 2200 player this sac looks terrific. i don't doubt it is correct. >>>unfortunately, there was no discussion here. if you post any stupid "mate in X" >> >>Would you mind posting it again, I haven't seen the position yet. > >r1r5/3nbpk1/4qnp1/4p1Bp/1pN1P3/1PP2Q2/4N1PP/3R1R1K b - - 0 26 > >[D]r1r5/3nbpk1/4qnp1/4p1Bp/1pN1P3/1PP2Q2/4N1PP/3R1R1K b - - 0 26 Thanks for posting that. My program prefers to play Rab8 with a score of about +.14 for white. Alternatively if I play Rxc4 and search from there, the score slowly drops. After a couple of hours it is +0.44 for white. It would be interesting to know what Junior's score was when playing this move, and what its score for Rab8 was. cheers, Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.