Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 14:52:32 08/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2002 at 17:19:26, Russell Reagan wrote: >>On August 20, 2002 at 15:43:22, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>>I have also done enough emotional damage to the author already I'm afraid and I >>>feel real bad about that, it was not my agenda in any way. > >On August 20, 2002 at 16:06:01, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>I'll second that. > >I'd be interested to know what your intentions were then... > >Russell Probably just not look right at it. When the author of the thesis provides significant statistical data by playing hundreds of games with different engine algorithms i can not imagine how somebody can earnestly say its a pice of junk copied from the internet. Science is about being able to use the theory in a practical model and then maybe come to new conclusions, although i think the conclusion part would be a bit arrogant for a graduating student. Anyway, I would sure look carefully a any new conclusions that are written in a masters thesis before I take it for granted. But I agree with most people here that the above thesis is quite interesting. Maybe some of us had a bit a bad day? Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.