Author: blass uri
Date: 18:54:12 08/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 1998 at 17:40:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >As i said, human beeings as animals too, are able to >look into the future by guessing accurate what will happen, >changing the past and the future (the past changes too, it is not HAPPENED). > >We can feel what will happen. We can also manipulate the outcome, by physical >and by mind. This is not difficult. > >in fact the reason is that ther is no gap between physics and mind. >it is the same. > >When i see games from chess programs, and i see the evaluations , main-lines and >search-depth and see the opponent live. I can tell you with 1 or to sample games >(cstal was so used to me, even a few moves were enough to tell precise enough) >which versions are stronger and which are weaker. I think 1 version can be stronger in 1 kind of positions and the other version can be stronger in another kind of positions so you cannot be sure by 1 game which version is stronger. If one version is a better in tactical positions and the other is better in quiet positions how can you say which one is better by 1 game? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.