Author: Tony Werten
Date: 16:30:51 09/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2002 at 18:48:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 06, 2002 at 18:40:16, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >> >>You shouldnt call an article excellent before you have implemented what it >>describes or tested it etc etc, shouldnt you ? >> >>Else how do you really know whether the article is excellent ? > >He talks about the same thing in his book. He had a win for the idea in his >program (but who knows if it will extrapolate to other programs). Hmm, mention a bad idea twice and it gets better ? > >At any rate, he is a good writer and very willing to share his ideas. Yes. His idea about interior node recognition made my program a lot stronger in the endgame. >Which reminds me -- I wonder what has become of Dark Thought. I wonder if >people are still working on it, or if it is gathering dust some where. Last time I spoke him (1.5 years ago) he was going for the dust. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.