Author: Slater Wold
Date: 05:22:21 09/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2002 at 05:54:46, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 12, 2002 at 21:47:50, Slater Wold wrote: > >>WITHOUT TABLEBASES: >> 24-> 1.80 -0.14 1. ... Ke6 2. Kg4 Kf6 3. Kf3 Kf5 4. >> g4+ Ke6 5. Ke3 Kd6 6. Kd2 Kc6 7. Kc3 >> Kb5 8. Kb3 h6 9. Kc3 Ka4 10. Kc2 Kb4 >> 11. Kd3 Kb3 <HT> >> 25 2.16 ++ 1. ... Ke6!! >> 25 2.58 -2.44 1. ... Ke6 2. Kg4 Kf6 3. Kf3 Kf5 4. >> g4+ Ke6 5. Ke3 Kd6 6. Kd3 Kc6 7. Kc3 >> Kb5 8. Kb3 h6 9. Kc3 Ka4 10. Kc2 Kb4 >> 11. Kd3 Kb3 12. Ke3 Kc3 13. Ke2 Kxd4 >> 14. Kf3 >>WITH TABLEBASES: >> 24-> 12.31 -0.14 1. ... Ke6 2. Kg4 Kf6 3. Kf3 Kf5 4. >> g4+ Ke6 5. Ke3 Kd6 6. Kd2 Kc6 7. Kc3 >> Kb5 8. Kb3 h6 9. Kc3 Ka4 10. Kd2 Kb4 >> 11. Kd3 Kb3 <HT> >> 25 13.57 ++ 1. ... Ke6!! >> 25 14.39 -2.28 1. ... Ke6 2. Kg4 Kf6 3. Kf3 Kf5 4. >> g4+ Ke6 5. Ke3 Kd6 6. h6 Kc6 7. Kd3 >> Kb5 8. Kc3 Ka4 9. Kd2 Kb3 10. Kd3 Kb4 >> 11. Kd2 Kc4 12. Ke3 Kc3 13. Kf2 Kxd4 >> 14. Kf3 > >Tablebases hurt :) > >-- >GCP I think most engines nowadays don't need TBs. 1 year ago, this wasn't the case. (The Tiger game comes to mind, where it could mate with B+N.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.