Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty 1714 vs Ruffian 101 WOW

Author: Mark Young

Date: 16:29:47 10/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 02, 2002 at 18:58:33, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On October 02, 2002 at 18:54:32, Mark Young wrote:
>[SNIP]
>>Both Crafty and Ruffian hit over 1000Kn/s on a P4 2.8 Ghz. My table bases are
>>set up correctly as always, and I have all TB files including 6 man TB files.
>>The hash tables are set at 128 Mb for all program under this time control.
>
>If you turn on Ruffian's logging, you can easily determine if it is finding
>tablebase files, opening books etc.  I also like to use Windows Task Manager to
>ensure that the memory is being allocated the way I want and that we don't have
>CPU hogging going on.
>
>>I am testing the UCI version....I don't know if that is a problem. I heard the
>>uci version works fine until now.
>
>Most of my tests are under Winboard, but I have a friend who has done extensive
>testing and he has indicated that UCI has problems.  I seem to recall something
>similar from the Winboard forum, but I am not sure about it.
>
>So my experience with UCI difficulties is mostly "word of mouth."  But I expect
>that there are some issues.


All the above has been checked before I test *any* program. CPU usage is 99 to
100 percent. TB files are being used and are working fine in Ruffian. Opening
book is being used, and book learning is working correctly. I gave all program a
clean copy of tiger book with all weights set at 0, I see that Ruffian as well
as all the programs being tested against Ruffian in my test are not having any
problems with hash tables, opening book, book learning, CPU usage, or Table Base
files etc.

All Programs use the same files as Ruffian (TB files and Opening book), the same
CPU as Ruffian, and the same hash table setting as Ruffian, as well as the same
Book learning settings.

The result is Ruffian has not shown itself to be a "Force" (yet in my testing)
any more then Crafty is a force. They are very strong programs, but not yet on
par with  Junior, Tiger, Hiarcs, Fritz or Shredder.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.