Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:20:24 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 13:15:21, Uri Blass wrote: >They can do other mistakes and Kramnik with the program can take advantage of >them. of course. but why programming as usual when this is the result of the BEST efforts ? we are totally ssdf-fixed. everybody tries to beat rank 1 instead of trying new stuff, new ideas that would make the program stronger in the long run. >Shredder6 lost against smirin at faster time control against a king attack and >had no idea how to play. might be. but shredder is better in positional stuff. >Shredder6 did not use the right book(it used Junior's book) shredder has a problem here. almost any game at championships shredder is strangely coming out of book , most often in a disadvantaged situation. >but shredder played >bad after book and the point is that every program seems to be stupid in the >right positions. ah come on. i have and know fritz for many many years. seeing it daily on my machines. its a stupid program. its fast, this is the reason it wins in ssdf list. and all the others have to follow this FAST race. otherwise they don't get the ssdf #1 trophy. but is THIS good for the progress in computerchess ? i don't think so. IMO we are making backsteps. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.