Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The "only" bad thing with Kramnik vs. Fritz!

Author: Jeremiah Penery

Date: 00:52:57 10/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 2002 at 02:21:00, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>Deep Fritz at least outsearches Deep Blue nominally by 4 ply,
>so your reasoning makes no sense.

Depending on how you count plies.  You could say that Junior searches twice as
deep as Fritz, but we know it's not really searching the same kind of plies.

Here is a quote from Hsu's book:

"Before Deep Blue went into the panic mode for Bxd6, it had come up with an
unusual principal variation when it finished its 9-ply search.  The main line it
gave was 15-ply deep.  This number, however, was only search depth on the master
workstation, and did not include the additional search depths on the slave
workstations (2+ plies), and on the chess chips (4+ plies)." (Hsu,229)

So it makes sense that 9(6) means 9 plies on the master workstation, and 6 plies
combined in slave workstations + chess chips.  Also, when Hsu quotes a depth of
"12-ply" or something for DB, I doubt he's counting the hardware there either,
but possibly he is counting the slaves.  This, for the simple reason that the
chess chips were not used exactly in the 'normal' way of simply splitting the
search to them with X remaining depth.  Instead, the slave workstations passed
positions and evaluation weights to them, upon which they did an EXTRA n-plies
of search - Almost more like a fancy q-search than a part of the normal search.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.