Author: Mike S.
Date: 12:35:33 10/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2002 at 15:18:48, stuart taylor wrote: >Why? Because even if Kramnik wins the last game, It doesn't make it look like >Deeper Blue was really any better than Deep Fritz. And also, it shows computers >to be up at the top, and also gives Kasparov a big incentive to beat that >result vs. Deep Junior. (...) Regarding mass media perspective, draws of both matches would be most useful results for computer chess in general. Because it neither could be claimed based on results that comps are stronger or that top human players are stronger. Which would mean, both the protesters against these 2 opinions had 50% to complain against, and the followers of both opinions would have 50% support each. So - optimistically thought - it could result in only half the nonsense than when one side would win. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.