Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 12:31:21 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 13:38:11, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On October 20, 2002 at 11:03:07, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>Doubtless, all chessplayers would have been very happy if Kramnik had played >>fantastic brilliancies in every game! >> >>Unfortunately, the inescapable conclusion would have been that "chess computers >>are just not up there yet." A rematch would then have been seen as pointless, >>at least until the computers had become better. Why rematch if the outcome is >>already known in advance? >> >>Similarly, if Fritz had smashed Kramnik. People would say that a rematch would >>be pointless because it was clear that the computer would win again. >> >>Bob D. > >So from the outcome of the match we can conclude that an equilibrium point was >reached more or less... > >w.b.r. >Otello Hmmm. You're using big words on me again! : )
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.