Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 10:38:11 10/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2002 at 11:03:07, Bob Durrett wrote: >Doubtless, all chessplayers would have been very happy if Kramnik had played >fantastic brilliancies in every game! > >Unfortunately, the inescapable conclusion would have been that "chess computers >are just not up there yet." A rematch would then have been seen as pointless, >at least until the computers had become better. Why rematch if the outcome is >already known in advance? > >Similarly, if Fritz had smashed Kramnik. People would say that a rematch would >be pointless because it was clear that the computer would win again. > >Bob D. So from the outcome of the match we can conclude that an equilibrium point was reached more or less... w.b.r. Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.