Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is It really so, that D.Fritz was better later because of changes?

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 10:52:24 10/27/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 26, 2002 at 22:10:14, Yatheen Manicka wrote:

>Even if Kramnik had not bludered in game 5 and fought for a
>draw in game 6, Deep Fritz did not come close to losing in the last 4 games.


Actually, I think that statement is in error.

If Kramnik had avoided temptation and played 19.Bd5 (which everybody commenting
on ICC easily saw) instead of sacrificing the knight on f7, I think he would
have won without great difficulty.  Even computers rated Kramnik's position as
clearly better.

2rqr1k1/p2n1ppp/bp1N1b2/8/PBpp4/1P4P1/5PBP/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 19

• Re: Fritz was better later because of changes? Diagram Roy Eassa 10:53:03 10/27/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.