Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 10:53:03 10/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2002 at 13:52:24, Roy Eassa wrote: >On October 26, 2002 at 22:10:14, Yatheen Manicka wrote: > >>Even if Kramnik had not bludered in game 5 and fought for a >>draw in game 6, Deep Fritz did not come close to losing in the last 4 games. > > >Actually, I think that statement is in error. > >If Kramnik had avoided temptation and played 19.Bd5 (which everybody commenting >on ICC easily saw) instead of sacrificing the knight on f7, I think he would >have won without great difficulty. Even computers rated Kramnik's position as >clearly better. > [d] 2rqr1k1/p2n1ppp/bp1N1b2/8/PBpp4/1P4P1/5PBP/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 19
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.