Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: But, Re: Questions re P4 3.03 with HT ??

Author: Matt Taylor

Date: 23:45:29 12/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 2002 at 00:23:52, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On December 10, 2002 at 23:05:22, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On December 10, 2002 at 22:51:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>Several post one set of results.  One person posts another.  And _that_
>>>post is the "bible"???
>>
>>No, but neither is the post totally worthless as you claim it to be.
>
>
>I've come to the conclusion that _most_ of his posts are worthless.
>
>A few examples:
>
>1.  The xeons with hyper-threading are not available and probably won't be
>available for a year or two.  Even though I just bought one from Dell and
>have it in my office.
>
>2.  hyper-threading doesn't work.  Even though both I and that "ferkin
>idiot" nalimov both posted results showing it _does_ work.
>
>3.  parallel search is deterministic in its behavior.  Even though every
>parallel researcher on the planet has discussed this non-deterministic behavior
>and how annoying it can be.
>
>4.  speedups > 2.0 for two processors and > 4.0 for four processors can
>be done and he "proofed" it.  Even though any textbook discussing parallel
>algorithms totally debunks this myth right off the bat...
>
>5.  If a program isn't "diep" it is "crap" or "buggy" or "rude" or "simple"
>or whatever else you want...  even though he can't reliably beat those
>programs with his.
>
>6.  The Intel compiler is buggy and can't produce correct code, even though it
>is used by professionals all over the world.
>
>7.  Crafty produces _no_ speedup when running on a dual processor.  Even though
>everyone that tried it came up with numbers close to the 1.7X I have mentioned
>for several years.
>
>I will get tired of typing before I run out of examples...
>
>The list goes on and on...
>
>crap, crap and more crap.  Covered with crap.  With crap on the top.

Look on the bright side. I find him very entertaining. He told me that my system
was incapable of running with a single DIMM. I double and triple-checked to make
sure: yep. I have my single 1 GB Samsung DIMM in there.

I had to check again just to make sure that chance hadn't taken advantage of me
and caused one to spontaneously form and seat itself properly. Plus, if it had,
I could probably make a lucrative business exploiting that.

I still haven't ruled out the possibility that such a phenomenon happens and the
DIMM disappears when I take off the side panel to my case. I need to get ram
gremlins to sit in there with a camera just-in-case. Maybe I'll go check
pricewatch for some ram gremlins...

-Matt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.