Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:53:34 12/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2002 at 13:46:45, Ingo Lindam wrote: >On December 11, 2002 at 13:23:23, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>I never said it 'has to be done with' -- only that they are equivalent and >>alternatives will not be superior. >> >>For that matter, the tree is nothing more than a visualization aid. The steps >>will be the same whether or not a tree is used to visualize it. > >So I understand you right that to prove that following position will end in a >draw is impossible by a giving proof less complex (smaller) than that very very >big tree of all possible continuations...??? > >[D] 6k1/bp1p1p1p/8/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/8/B3K3/8 w - - 0 1 > >You are just kidding, aren't you? > >Internette Grüße, >Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.