Author: Ingo Lindam
Date: 10:46:45 12/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 11, 2002 at 13:23:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >I never said it 'has to be done with' -- only that they are equivalent and >alternatives will not be superior. > >For that matter, the tree is nothing more than a visualization aid. The steps >will be the same whether or not a tree is used to visualize it. So I understand you right that to prove that following position will end in a draw is impossible by a giving proof less complex (smaller) than that very very big tree of all possible continuations...??? [D] 6k1/bp1p1p1p/8/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/8/B3K3/8 w - - 0 1 You are just kidding, aren't you? Internette Grüße, Ingo
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.