Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: I don't think that the Tungsten T is 10X Faster , NOT even 6X Faster

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:52:29 12/13/02

Go up one level in this thread

On December 13, 2002 at 14:16:06, Dan Andersson wrote:

>My experiences with CodeWarrior are not that good. I used it on the BeOS
>operating system. Both the PPC and x86 natives were slower than using GCC
>compiled ones. Be did the right thing when they went all GCC. So I would not bet
>money on the ARM compiler. But then again they might have implemented some of
>the algorithms used in GCC.

The newest GCC versions (3.x and higher) are a big step up from the older 2.9x
series.  You will have to be of excellent quality to surpass it.  Only a few
commercial compilers can do it.   I think the latest GCC is better than some of
the older commercial compilers like Watcom and Borland.

• Re: I don't think that the Tungsten T is 10X Faster , NOT even 6X Faster Tord Romstad 06:48:58 12/15/02
• Re: I don't think that the Tungsten T is 10X Faster , NOT even 6X Faster Dan Andersson 12:04:24 12/13/02
  • Re: I don't think that the Tungsten T is 10X Faster , NOT even 6X Faster David Rasmussen 15:23:54 12/14/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.