Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 04:49:36 12/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2002 at 07:40:55, Russell Reagan wrote: >On December 20, 2002 at 07:26:12, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>But I didn't think any bitboarders generated all moves since bitboards are so >>good at incremental generation, is this what you do? > >Hi Sune, > >What do you mean by incremental move generation? Are you talking about how it's >easier to generate captures only (and other similar types of moves)? Or are you >talking about generating only the difference in the move list from ply to ply? > >Russell Hi Russell I understand your confusion :) It seems to me that everyone says "incremental move generator" about captures and non-captures generation. So I have joined the club, finally, although I still consider it a poor choice of words. Can you think of a better word, so we don't have to steal anything from the movelist updaters? -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.