Author: Keith Ian Price
Date: 19:31:48 09/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1998 at 18:30:18, Moritz Berger wrote: >On September 19, 1998 at 14:04:24, Keith Ian Price wrote: > >>On September 19, 1998 at 13:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: >> >>>On September 19, 1998 at 10:14:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Version 284 was on the server. It was a broken version. >>>>Than version 289 was on the server. But people like Harald Faber, dirk and >>>>moritz complained about this version because it had 2 executables. >>> >>>I want to clarify that I never complained about this version because it had >>>2 executables. I don't even remember complaining about it at all. >> >>Is it reasonable to infer from your statement that Thorsten was correct in >>stating that you do have version 289? > >He sent me a verson some time ago that gives 2 error messages at the start but >seems to work like I verified now. > >-> I gave CST a PII-400 vs. P233MMX for Hiarcs 6 > >-> I used the only publically available "Paris" update and checked twice to >ensure that I had the most recent file from the server > >-> I wrote that I was willing to repeat the Nunn test (20 games) with the other >version. This would certainly yield invaluable data about the claim that one >version was "broken" while the other was not. > >-> I invited Thorsten to play the very same Nunn match on his machines, with the >very best CST/Windows version he has, against the same Hiarcs 6 that I use. If >his Windows version scored better, don't you agree that this would be a nice >upgrade incentive for all CST customers???? > >-> I kept logfiles for all CST games, available for anybody who wants them >(including members of the CST team). I am basically doing unpaid beta testing >for certain people who have called me "little Hitler" and other things. > > >What more do you expect from me???? > > > >Moritz Actually nothing more. If you truly tested what you thought was the recommended version, then I do not find your actions objectionable. However, i would request that you begin using CSTBlack for the remainder of your testing, as this version is stronger against computers than the 284 version. This is the one I would like to see results from. thanks, kp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.