Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 15:30:18 09/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1998 at 14:04:24, Keith Ian Price wrote: >On September 19, 1998 at 13:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: > >>On September 19, 1998 at 10:14:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >> >>>Version 284 was on the server. It was a broken version. >>>Than version 289 was on the server. But people like Harald Faber, dirk and >>>moritz complained about this version because it had 2 executables. >> >>I want to clarify that I never complained about this version because it had 2 >>executables. I don't even remember complaining about it at all. > >Is it reasonable to infer from your statement that Thorsten was correct in >stating that you do have version 289? He sent me a verson some time ago that gives 2 error messages at the start but seems to work like I verified now. -> I gave CST a PII-400 vs. P233MMX for Hiarcs 6 -> I used the only publically available "Paris" update and checked twice to ensure that I had the most recent file from the server -> I wrote that I was willing to repeat the Nunn test (20 games) with the other version. This would certainly yield invaluable data about the claim that one version was "broken" while the other was not. -> I invited Thorsten to play the very same Nunn match on his machines, with the very best CST/Windows version he has, against the same Hiarcs 6 that I use. If his Windows version scored better, don't you agree that this would be a nice upgrade incentive for all CST customers???? -> I kept logfiles for all CST games, available for anybody who wants them (including members of the CST team). I am basically doing unpaid beta testing for certain people who have called me "little Hitler" and other things. What more do you expect from me???? Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.