Author: Keith Ian Price
Date: 11:04:24 09/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 1998 at 13:20:32, Moritz Berger wrote: >On September 19, 1998 at 10:14:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: > > >>Version 284 was on the server. It was a broken version. >>Than version 289 was on the server. But people like Harald Faber, dirk and >>moritz complained about this version because it had 2 executables. > >I want to clarify that I never complained about this version because it had 2 >executables. I don't even remember complaining about it at all. Is it reasonable to infer from your statement that Thorsten was correct in stating that you do have version 289? >>Chris has now, as a result of this discussion here and the shit prussian >>behaviour of people like moritz and others, deleted also the version 284. So >>that NO version is on the server. >> >>Any normal customer can now thank to moritz and harald and other guys who are >>never satisfied, even if they get a program for free. > > >I strongly object against your classification of my behavior. Your language is >repulsive to me, I would be grateful if you took my feelings into account when >writing such things about me. If you have a better version and are using an older version to conduct your test, I can see why Thorsten would get angry, especially since you complained that his tournament results differ from the Swedes' since his tournament has a different operator. Then if he sees you using an older version when he has sent you a newer and better version, I can understand his frustration. Since you know how emotional his reaction normally would be to such a thing, I think you failed to take his feelings into account, and have deliberately tried to "rile him up" with this test. However, I will withhold judgement until I have your reply outlining any reasons you have for conducting this test with the older version. >>>Tord >> >> >>ok - is anything now UNDERSTANDABLE ?? >> >>If the complaints continue, and the unfair behaviour , we have decided not to >>release Chess System Tal win95 anyway. > > >You forgot to mention that I'm responsible for El Nino, too. And the Asian >recession ... Not to mention global warming and the ozon layer. Careful, Moritz, with the global warming suggestion you are leaving yourself open to remarks about "hot air". :-) >>We are not releasing Chess System Tal Win95 to make money. We are interested >>in making a strong and knowledged playing chess program, get echo from nice >>end-customers. > >You describe "end-customers" as if they were some kind of sheep. Strange. I did not read this into that remark. >Kind regards > >Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.