Author: margolies,marc
Date: 19:53:22 01/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
this matter was covered in english in some detail at chessbase site, although tongue in cheek. the arbiter knew the player wasn't doing his business in the stall, so your complaint seems to be a red herring. and since you live in the land of that notorious cheat, althoffer, perhaps you may feel better knowing that your arbiters are attempting to keep your national opens honest enough so that other players will consider joining them and they might continue to exist. On January 11, 2003 at 15:09:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >In Germany we allegedly have a new case of betrayal with a computer chess >program. After 1999, when allegedly a transmitter was involved and FRITZ, this >time someone went to the loo and instead of sitting straight he _stood_ >(allegedly) in parallel [!!!] mode to the WC so that a real physiological >process could not happen. All that was reported by an eager arbiter who looked >under the door and then went into the neighbour cabin and climbed on the WC to >get a better view on the stinking processes. > >As usual I made my own thoughts about such incredible aberrant behaviour of an >arbiter! > >Would you think that the violation of the privacy of the player was justified in >case of such betrayal? How about TV transmission of such p___ & sh____ >processes? Male/ Female? Perhaps all this could attract the masses... > >If you have a minimum of German you might read my discussion in > >http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/13.html > > >Kind regards > >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.