Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 10:18:14 01/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2003 at 14:57:49, Mark Young wrote: >New game >[d]8/8/8/5p1p/8/1p4PP/2k1K3/3N4 w - - 0 1 Looks like the amount of hash used is an issue here. At least on my computer F8 is *much* faster finding h4, when 256 Mb hash is used - compared to 128 Mb. /s > >Analysis by Fritz 8: > >1.Ne3+-- > ² (0.44) Depth: 7/12 00:00:00 4kN, tb=2 >1.Ne3+ Kc1 2.Nc4 h4 3.gxh4 > ² (0.41) Depth: 7/13 00:00:00 5kN, tb=2 >1.Ne3+! > ² (0.69) Depth: 8/17 00:00:00 34kN, tb=3 >1.Ne3+-- > ² (0.41) Depth: 9/16 00:00:00 46kN, tb=7 >1.Ne3+ Kc1 2.Nc4 > ² (0.41) Depth: 9/17 00:00:00 48kN, tb=7 >1.Ne3+! > ² (0.69) Depth: 10/16 00:00:00 60kN, tb=9 >1.Ne3+ Kc3 2.Nf1 b2 3.Nd2 Kc2 4.Nc4 b1N 5.Ne3+ Kb3 6.Nxf5 Kb2 > ² (0.69) Depth: 11/22 00:00:00 199kN, tb=85 >1.Ne3+! > ± (0.97) Depth: 12/23 00:00:00 388kN, tb=168 >1.Ne3+-- > ² (0.69) Depth: 13/26 00:00:01 848kN, tb=699 >1.Ne3+ Kc3 2.h4 b2 3.Nd1+ > ² (0.69) Depth: 13/26 00:00:01 875kN, tb=705 >1.Ne3+! > ± (0.97) Depth: 14/25 00:00:01 1091kN, tb=951 >1.Ne3+-- > ² (0.69) Depth: 15/33 00:00:02 2194kN, tb=2713 >1.Ne3+ Kc3 2.h4 b2 3.Nd1+ > ² (0.69) Depth: 15/33 00:00:02 2284kN, tb=2795 >1.Ne3+! > ± (0.97) Depth: 16/30 00:00:03 2863kN, tb=3943 >1.Ne3+-- > ² (0.69) Depth: 17/38 00:00:08 7399kN, tb=11985 >1.Ne3+ Kc3 2.h4 b2 3.Nd1+ > ² (0.69) Depth: 17/38 00:00:08 7669kN, tb=12325 >1.h4! > ± (0.72) Depth: 17/38 00:00:09 8173kN, tb=14104 >1.h4! > ± (0.88) Depth: 17/38 00:00:09 8198kN, tb=14598 >1.h4! > ± (1.19) Depth: 17/38 00:00:09 8317kN, tb=15534 >1.h4! > +- (1.47) Depth: 18/33 00:00:10 9103kN, tb=18200 >1.h4! > +- (1.75) Depth: 19/32 00:00:14 12549kN, tb=30276 >1.h4! > +- (2.03) Depth: 20/33 00:00:21 16724kN, tb=47584 >1.h4! > +- (2.31) Depth: 21/37 00:00:40 24541kN, tb=82745 >1.h4! > +- (2.59) Depth: 21/37 00:00:44 27279kN, tb=98972 > >(Young, MyTown 11.01.2003)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.