Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 13:36:22 01/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2003 at 03:43:46, Jeroen Noomen wrote: Rebel laptop - junior blue. like 5-0 or so? see the 'quality' of the moves. do not care for missing a book. it didn't know a thing from pawn structure, bad bishops or anything which every engine nowadays has (has fritz bad bishops by the way? doesn't seem so is it?) >On January 11, 2003 at 14:32:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Any software program of today outsearches positional Deep Blue of course, >>this is clearly the case. >> >>also we both know that in 1997 programs knew shit from endgames nor middlegame. >>That's quite some difference now. In 1997 i remember that beancounters (and DB >>was a very good beancounter for its time) did pretty well. > >As I was trying to say: We know a lot, we speculate a lot, but there is only one >method to find out if Deep Blue is worse than the current programs: They have to >play matches. > >In other words: I don't take words as facts. Only scores. > >Jeroem
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.