Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue

Author: Jeroen Noomen

Date: 00:43:46 01/12/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 11, 2003 at 14:32:08, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>Any software program of today outsearches positional Deep Blue of course,
>this is clearly the case.
>
>also we both know that in 1997 programs knew shit from endgames nor middlegame.
>That's quite some difference now. In 1997 i remember that beancounters (and DB
>was a very good beancounter for its time) did pretty well.

As I was trying to say: We know a lot, we speculate a lot, but there is only one
method to find out if Deep Blue is worse than the current programs: They have to
play matches.

In other words: I don't take words as facts. Only scores.

Jeroem

• Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Vincent Diepeveen 13:36:22 01/12/03
• Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Rolf Tueschen 08:05:32 01/12/03
  • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Uri Blass 08:13:11 01/12/03
    • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Robert Hyatt 21:31:09 01/12/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.