Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 11:32:08 01/11/03

Go up one level in this thread

On January 11, 2003 at 10:18:20, Jeroen Noomen wrote:

>On January 11, 2003 at 09:12:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>Look to the many idiotic moves Deep Blue played and try all those positions on
>>Junior.
>>
>>Then you'll know enough.
>>
>>Easy test nah?
>
>
>There is only one method to find out: Let them play a match. All other idea's
>are just speculation. Junior might be positionally better, but what use is this
>when it will be completely outsearched?
>
>Useless discussion.
>
>Jeroen

Any software program of today outsearches positional Deep Blue of course,
this is clearly the case.

also we both know that in 1997 programs knew shit from endgames nor middlegame.
That's quite some difference now. In 1997 i remember that beancounters (and DB
was a very good beancounter for its time) did pretty well.

• Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Jeroen Noomen 00:43:46 01/12/03
  • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Vincent Diepeveen 13:36:22 01/12/03
  • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Rolf Tueschen 08:05:32 01/12/03
    • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Uri Blass 08:13:11 01/12/03
      • Re: Junior better understanding of chess than Deep Blue Robert Hyatt 21:31:09 01/12/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.