Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Message to Shaun Graham

Author: Shaun Graham

Date: 13:52:52 09/26/98

Go up one level in this thread




>Shaun,
>
>1. The last paragraph, as a response to a moderator warning, is out of line.

Firstly standing up and protesting when you make some case without hearing from
me first is more than in line with both justice, and logic.
>
>2. Judging by what you are posting in "CCC and member behavior", you are not
>taking the warning seriously. For your information, the moderators look at the
>"case" you are trying to make as ridiculous, and continuing to attack Bob Hyatt
>as a liar is not what we expect you to do now.

Further i am nort trying to make a case because the case is there to be seen.
In a CCC post Bob Hyatt agreed to stay out of my postings, he has failed to
comply thus it's harrasment for the reason that since he knows that i do not
wish any contact or correspondence him, continued responses to my post when he
has IN WRITING agreed to stay out of my posts, constitutes a violation of CCC
policy because it's harassment.  Further not only is it just that he replied,
it's that he replied with attacking comments.
>
>3. The moderators count what is happening this weekend as your 3rd offense. The
>last time was around Sep. 12, when you received a warning from Bruce. In both of
>the previous cases, messages written by you, attacking Sep. 12, were deleted.

I have never recieved any posts from Bruce, because Bruce Moreland does not have
my email address, something you know very well.
>
>4. If you have anything further to say on this, say it by private email. We need
>from you a functioning email address where you can be reached.
>
No this has to do with not only my treatment on CCC but every person that you
continue to allow Bob Hyatt to harass at his leisure with out censure.  The mere
Idea, that IT IS IN THE RECORD PLAINLY THAT BOB HYATT IS LYING.  You seeing with
your own eyes, thus this is not a matter of hearsay or oppinion, and you attempt
to defend a LIE.  How can you justify what is an obvious and blatant lie in this
group?  Bob Hyatt posts that "He will stay out of Shaun Graham's post"  And then
you see Bob Hyatt posting in Shaun Graham's post.  You can defend a lie all you
want it's a black mark on your own credibility and the credibility of CCC
administration.  You know that it is i wouldn't be surprised if you attempt to
delete this post to cover up this corruption, because you know it can not be
seen as anything other than that.  Further you replied here instead of to the
CCC and Member Begavior because you know there is no attackable point.  I'm
fully in the right.

Shaun Graham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.